Poets Walk, NY    Robert Leverett
  May 30, 2006 06:42 PDT 
ENTS,

On Saturday, Holly Post, Monica Jakuc, and I went to a site named the
Poet’s Walk which is located on the Hudson River near Red Hook, NY. It
was supposed to be a location harboring big trees. But, the area has
clay based soils, so tree height is not conspicuous in locations that
would otherwise grow tall trees. The RHI might go to 85 feet at Poets
Walk, but 90 is not even a reasonable dream. However, species diversity
at Poet’s Walk is fairly high. I identified 29 species of trees on a
2-mile roundtrip walk. Monica identified 20 species of birds and said
she missed some. She identified 5 species of butterflies without even
trying. But with respect to both fauna and flora, there were no
surprises.

While there wasn't anything to hoot about over either tree height or
girth, there were very old chestnut oaks, white oaks, hemlocks, and
black birches growing on the banks above the Hudson. In fact, the old
white oaks appeared to be broadly scattered all over the property. I
wouldn't flinch at ages in the 200 to 250 year age range and possibly
some much older for isolated trees. The tree species list is as follows:
N. red oak, swamp white oak, chestnut oak, white oak, American basswood,
White ash, black birch, sugar maple, hop hornbeam, green ash, white
pine, red maple, pitch pine, shagbark hickory, eastern red cedar,
stahgorn sumac, black walnut (probably planted), black locust, pignut
hickory, black cherry, witch hazel, dogwood, eastern hemlock, American
elm, white birch, cucumber magnolia, American hornbeam, silver maple,
and tuliptree. Absent from my list, but probably present on the property
somewhere is American beech, black oak, and eastern cottonwood. I
believe there are 32 or 33 species altogether on about 120 acres.
Scattered throughout the meadows was a lot of poison ivy.    

Despite the let down on tall trees, the views within and across the
meadows of the property are first rate. One looks across the Hudson and
to the dreamy Catskills beyond. The scene is one of exquisite beauty and
it is abundantly clear to see what so inspired the Hudson River School
of Art artists. I would return over and over to the Poets Walk for the
views alone. It has that quality. I think Holly intends to do paintings
of the area.

On Sunday we visited the Pine Plains sycamore to begin the tree
modeling process. Monica positioned herself at the base of the tree with
her paper and read and communed. Holly took digital images and measured
the great tree’s stature. I fiddled with measuring equipment, took some
preliminary measurements, and quickly came to the realization that the
complicated Pine Plains sycamore is going to take at least 3 more
extended visits, and without a good sketch of the tree's architecture to
identify what needs to be measured, what has been measured, and what
needs to be re-measured, forget it. So, I switched gears and made a
rough sketch of the trunk and big limbs and then resumed the measuring
process. Later, Holly will make a more detailed, better scaled drawing.
That assignment fits her well because she is an artist. BTW, Holly lives
in historic Woodstock, NY, on the slope of the Catskills. Holly has
plenty of relatives in Woodstock and she gave Monica and I a semi-grand
tour on Sunday AM. It would have been a grand tour, but I was fidgety
about getting to the Pine Plains sycamore. We got to the tree at 1:00PM,
so there was plenty of time, had I been better prepared.

I'll relate as much information as I gleaned from the first measuring
exercise.

Total height:                   114.7' (individual measurements range
                                     from 114.0 to 115.2 ft)
Girth at ground level:       28.0'
Girth at 4.5 feet:              26.5'
Girth at 6.3 feet:              27.3'
(The monocular gave the equivalent of 26.7' at the point of observation.
The huge tree is thicker at right angles to the above measurement. This
will give rise to a second set of measurements at right angles to the
first.)

Average crown spread:    141.1'
Maximum spread:          146.0'


The point of separation of the limbs from the trunk where the limbs are
clearly separate comes at approximately 12 feet above the base. At just
below 12 feet where there is solid wood throughout, the diameter of the
Pine Plains tree is over 10 feet. Probably 11. There are 5 huge limbs.
The following information covers the measurements taken, plus an
estimated one.

Limb#    Girth Where

1              13.3 (at start)
2              11.0 (at start)
3               9.1 (at start. Limb broken off long ago. remainder about
                        5 feet)
4              12.9 (about 5 feet above the point with trunk separation.
                        Separation point not visible from vantage point)
5            Not measured (at least 12.5 feet)

The limbs of this great tree repeatedly divide. At 19 feet, above the
first major division, limb #1 is still 12.6 feet around. At 26 feet up,
above a minor division, limb #4 is 11.7 feet around. There is a lot of
wood in the Pine Plains sycamore.

Just eye-balling the tree, my guess is that its total trunk-limb volume
is between 2300 and 2800 cubic feet. I suppose it is possible that the
total trunk-limb volume could go a little higher than the 2800, but I
really don't think so from discussions with Will of what kinds of
dimensions lead to 3000 cubes and more. My best guess at this point is
2400 cubes for the Pine Plains sycamore. Regardless, the Pine Plains
Sycamore is one of the great Northeastern trees. And there are so many
twists and turns and limb divisions that it challenges us to measure it.
We will have to parse this tree into many parts and work on it limb at a
time.

I look very forward to developing an accurate model of the Pine Plains
sycamore. Its rural setting is ideal. The road by the cornfield in which
it sets is not busy. One does not have to contend with gawkers, traffic
noises, etc.

A big challenge in modeling huge, spreading trees altogether from the
ground is that one must shift back and forth among multiple locations to
get full visibility of each object being measured. The best plan is to
first sketch the tree, decide on where to take measurements, and to
number the points on the drawing. Then one simply chooses a target and
sticks with it until it has been satisfactorily measured. The first
target might be the lower trunk. There after, a short section of one
limb to a point of separation is a logical next step. Areas of limb
division are always problematic because of the changes in curvature and
the changes in cross sectional form. Often there is a veritable
explosion of limbs from a common point, with one or more limbs partially
hidden.

With all the variables to contend with, initially, it is easy to feel
overwhelmed with the sheer magnitude of the measuring challenge. One is
inclined to try to do too much at one time. A point worth emphasizing is
that modeling huge spreading hardwoods is truly a world apart from
modeling compact, columnar pines and hemlocks. If regular geometric
shapes characterize forest-grown pines and hemlocks, the lack there of
characterize the big spreading hardwoods. So, volume modeling of the big
hardwoods can never be the province of simple log-oriented forest
mensuration techniques that treat the object to be measured as a
composite of simple forms that lend themselves to a quick averaging
process. Therefore, the newly spawned ENTS applied branch of science
that we'll call dendromorphometry is poles apart from forest
mensuration. One cannot be substituted for the other. One is not a
subset or superset of the other.

Bob

Robert T. Leverett
Cofounder, Eastern Native Tree Society